Artistic Interpretations of Prometheus in Ancient, European, and Georgian Literature
PDF

Keywords

Prometheus
myth
literature
ancient literature
European literature
Georgian literature
negative
positive

How to Cite

Chikhladze, N. (2024). Artistic Interpretations of Prometheus in Ancient, European, and Georgian Literature. Bibliotekarz Podlaski, 63(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.36770/bp.911

Abstract

The image of Prometheus, the Greek counterpart of Amirani from Georgian mythology, has long been a significant source of inspiration in world culture. The recognition of the Prometheus myth was driven by several factors, with Aeschylus creating the most important portrayal of Prometheus, which influenced many later writers. In the Hellenistic and Roman literature, Prometheus was studied from various perspectives and became a popular mythological figure. Despite many satirical and comedic interpretations, the elevated character created by Aeschylus stood out. As literary and artistic interpretations evolved, Prometheus continued to symbolize the struggle for freedom and opposition to tyranny. This character remained relevant in later periods, including the Renaissance and beyond, reflecting both positive and negative aspects of civilization and technological progress. By the 19th century, Prometheus was often depicted with elements of satire, and his image intersected with that of Christ. In the 20th century and beyond, the traditional literary portrayal of Prometheus gave way to more symbolic interpretations, focusing on his broader significance rather than specific artistic depictions. Authors have portrayed Prometheus with a balance of positive and negative traits, contributing to his enduring presence in world literature.

https://doi.org/10.36770/bp.911
PDF

References

Chikhladze N., The Genesis and Formation of Oppositions in the Artistic Face of Prometheus, Tbilisi 2006.

Bap K., Prometheus, RML, III,3032–3220.

Awad L., The Theme of Prometheus in English and French literature, Princeton 1994.

Burkert W., Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual, Berkeley 1979.

Clarke H.A., Prometheus Theme In the18th English Literature, California 1970.

Der Neue Pauly Enzyklopadie der Antike, Stuttgart–Weimar 2002.

Frenzel E., Stoffe der Weltliterature, Stuttgart 1976.

Kirk G.S., The Nature of Greek Myths, Cambridge 1999.

Lesky A., Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, Benr and Munchen 1971.

Parke H.W., Festivals of the Athenians, London 1986.

Prado W.D., The Philosophy of Prometheus Unbound, “Saint Luis University Research Journal” 2001, Vol. I.

Reizis M.B., From Caucasus to Pittsburgh, “Gnossis” 1981.

Sechon L., Le Mythe de Prometheus, Paris 2019.

The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Ed. Kenney E., Clausen W.V. Cambridge 1982.

The Oxford Classical Dictionary, Ed. Hammond N.G.L., Scullard H., Clarendon 1979.

Wasserman E.J., Prometheus Unbound, a Critical Reading, Baltimore 2003.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Nino Chikhladze

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.